Skip to content Skip to navigation

METRICS International Forum

Metrics International Forum is a weeky online webinar on meta-research topics. It occurs every Thursday 9:00 am PT time. 

It started in 2020 as a subscription based forum, and since February 2022 it is open for the public. We do however ask all participants to:

  • maintain professional  discourse
  • post questions in chat - or raise their "virtual" hand - and wait to ask the question live when propmeted by the moderators
  • keep zoom on mute when not speaking

 Any offensive, discriminatory or unprofessional behaviour may lead to  sanctions, incuding being kicked out of the meeting.

This is a supportive and inclusive community, and we are grateful to all our participants for keeping it this way.

The link to the meeting is:

https://stanford.zoom.us/j/92048898481?pwd=TmUwd05BeEFEN0tvMTFGcGZENmlQZz09

Password (if prompted): 007007

If you woud like to present to one of our following meetings, please fill out this form and we will come back to you:

 

Upcoming speakers:

May 12  Benjamin Djulbegovic. How do guidelines panels decide?

May 19 Danielle Fanelli

May 26  Noah Haber

June 2 Peter Sjograde

Previous Speakers:

2022: 

Emmanuel Zavalis (May 5). A meta-epidemiological assessment of transparency indicators of infectious disease models. - Presentation

Daniel Strech (Apr 28). Ready for translation? How inestigator brochures present supporting evidence and how they could improve. - Presentation

Esther Pearl (Apr 22) The Experimental Design Assistant: a tool to improve in vivo research. - Presentation

Ivan Stelmakh (Apr 14). Two Studies on Peer Review: Citation Bias and arXiv Bias - Presentation

Jackie Thompson and Robbie Clark (Apr 7)Incentivising Registered Reports through funder-journal partnerships: a qualitative feasibility study- Presentation

Alexandra Sarafoglou & Suzanne Hoogeveen (Mar 31). The Many-Analysts Religion Project: Key Findings and Meta-Scientific Insights - Presentation

Carole Lunny (Mar 24). Development of a new risk of bias tool for network meta-analysis. - Presentation.

Tim Errington (Mar 17). Barriers to replicating preclinical cancer biology research - challenges or opportunities? - Presentation

Marcus Munafo (Mar 10). From Grassroots to Global: Building a Reproducibility Network - Presentation

Shilaan Alzahawi (Feb 24). Lay Perceptions of Scientific Findings: Swayed by the Crowd? - Presentation

Tom Hardwicke (Feb 17).  How should journals handle scientific criticism? - Presentation

 (Before Feb 17 Forum was closed - we are seeking permission to upload presentations):

10-Feb Maximilian Siebert     

03-Feb Arjun Manraj

27-Jan Tom Stanley   Harnessing Excess Statistical Significance for Meta-Research and Meta-Analysis

20-Jan Leonhard Held

13-Jan Matthew Page

06-Jan Benjamin Djulbegovic.  Avoidable and unavoidable research waste in (biomedical) research

 

2021:

09-Dec Jason Chin. Using metaresearch to improve the legal system

18-Nov Nihar Shah. Improving Peer Review via Principled and Practical Approaches

11-Nov Mario Malički. How do manuscripts change and what does that tell us of peer review?

28-Oct Spencer Harpe Meta-research in pharmacy: What are we doing?

21-Oct Jennifer Miller. Equitable access to the benefits of clinical research

14-Oct Omer Benjakob, Rona Aviram, Jonathan Sobel. Wikipedia & COVID-19: Science on the frontlines of coronavirus disinformation

07-Oct Kristijan Armeni and Loek Brinkman. Open science: meta-research shows the way, open science communities walk the walk

30-Sep Philipp Koellinger. Designing incentives for scientists to improve the replicability of research

16-Sep Tracey Weissberger. Training early career researchers to use meta-research to improve science: A participant-guided, "learn by doing" approach

09-Sep Karima Chaabna. The State of Population Health Research Performance in the Middle East and North Africa: a Meta-Research Study

02-Sep Simine Vazire. Evaluating research on its own merits

26-Aug  Leo Tiokhin. Structuring Incentives to Improve the Efficiency and Reliability of Science: Modeling the Effect of Incentives for Priority of Discovery

02-Sep Simine Vazire Evaluating research on its own merits

26-Aug Leo Tiokhin    Structuring Incentives to Improve the Efficiency and Reliability of Science: Modeling the Effect of Incentives for Priority of Discovery

19-Aug  David Pina. The Marie Curie mobility programme as a case study for meta-research

12-Aug  Manoj Lalu. Lifting the lid on randomized control trials published in predatory journals

29-Jul  Nate Breznau.  Observing Many Researchers Using the Same Data and Hypothesis Reveals a Hidden Universe of Uncertainty

22-Jul  Daniel Dunleavy.Progressive and degenerative journals: On the growth and appraisal of knowledge in scholarly publishing

15-Jul  Maya Mathur. Sensitivity analysis for p-hacking in meta-analyses

24-Jun Zoltan Dienes. Registered Reports 2.0: Introducing the Peer Community in Registered Reports

17-Jun Antica Culina. Unused potential of ecological research, and the role of reproducibility

10-Jun Holly Witteman. Strategies for funding agencies to address inequities in funding allocation

03-Jun Mohammad Hosseini. An ethical analysis of equal co-authorship practices

27-May Balazs Aczel. Developing tools and practices to promote open and efficient science          

20-May Isabelle Boutron. Interventional research on research: development and evaluation of interventions to improve research value

13-May Jon Krosnick. The collapse of scientific standards in the world of high visibility survey research

06-May  Mark M Musen.  When FAIR is foul and foul is FAIR, how can we ever measure data FAIRness?

29-Apr Jeroen Baas.   When peer reviewers go rogue - Estimated prevalence of citation manipulation by reviewers based on the citation patterns of 69,000 reviewers

22-Apr Yian Yin.  Coevolution of policy and science during the pandemic

15-Apr Riccardo De Bin.  Modelling publication bias and p-hacking

08-Apr Brett Thombs and Brooke Levis.  Use of individual participant data meta-analysis to address problematic research on mental health assessment

25-Mar  Charles Bennett.  Harms to physicians, patients, and pharmaceutical manufacturers following clinician reporting of titanic Adverse Drug Reactions

18-Mar  Anne-Laure Boulesteix.  A replication crisis in methodological statistical research?

11-Mar Florian Naudet Busting. 4 zombie trials in a post-apocalyptic world

04-Mar Jamie Kirkham. Preprint servers are rapidly disseminating crucial pandemic science – but do they safeguard against unfounded medical claims?

25-Feb Sabine Hoffmann   The multiplicity of analysis strategies jeopardizes replicability: lessons learned across disciplines

18-Feb Prabhat Jha     Serological and mortality studies of SARS-CoV-2 infection in Canada and India

11-Feb Noah Haber     Problems with Evidence Assessment in COVID-19 Health Policy Impact Evaluation (PEACHPIE): A systematic strength of methods review

04-Feb Ben W Mol     Are the data that ‘inform’ us true?

28-Jan Anna Dreber   Predicting replication outcomes

 

2020: (Forum was closed - we are seeking permission to upload presentations):

Stefan Schandelmaier (Dec 17). A new library of methods guidance and other plans to improve knowledge translation from methods developers and meta-researchers to primary researchers

Terry Klassen (Dec 10). RCTs in Child Health: Frequentist approaches failing, is the future Bayesian analyses?

Katrin Auspurg and Alexander Tekles (Dec 3) .Do male researchers disregard the work of female researchers? The role of gender in citation decisions

Despina Koletsi (Nov 19). GRADE…ing Quality of the Evidence. Where do we stand?

Andreas Schneck (Nov 12). Are most published research findings false? Trends in statistical power, publication bias and p-hacking as well as the false discovery rate in psychology (1975–2017)

Janneke van 't Hooft (Nov 5). The road towards more Useful randomised controlled trials (RCTs). Preterm birth RCTs as an example.

Robert J MacCoun (Oct 29). p-Hacking: A Strategic Analysis

Atle Fretheim (Oct 22). Randomized trial of school closures in Norway (spoiler alert: it didn’t happen)

Hank Greely (Oct 15). CRISPR Babies: Assessing Human Germline Genome Editing

Deborah Zarin (Oct 8). Lack of Harmonization of Outcome Measures in COVID trials, and other Musings

Peter Gøtzsche (Oct 1). Mental health survival kit and withdrawal from psychiatric drugs

Peter Grabitz, Maia Salholz-Hillel, Nicholas Devito (Sept 10). Rapid Results Dissemination of Registered COVID-19 Clinical Trials

Jelte Wicherts (Sept 3). The continuing secrecy surrounding psychological research data

Mario Malički (Aug 27). From amazing work to I beg to differ: analysis of bioRxiv preprints that received one public comment till September 2019

Nikolaos Pandis (Aug 20). Who is running the show? The role of the industry in the practice of dentistry and a brief overview of evidence quality in dental research

David R Grimes (Aug 13). Lies, Damned lies, and statistics - the influence of bad science on public understanding

Kevin Boyack (July 30). A detailed open access model of the PubMed literature

Sally Cripps (July 23). A Tale of > 2 Models

Mario Malički (July 2). How should we classify changes between manuscript versions?

Vinay Prasad (June 18). The lay of the land of cancer research

Valentin Danchev (June 11). Designing a Clinical-Data Marketplace to Accelerate Sharing and Reuse of Covid-19 Clinical Data and Beyond

Chirag Patel (June 4). Real-world meta-science to identify environmental disparities and non-genetic correlates of phenotypesAbstract:

Denes Szucs (May 28). Sample size evolution in neuroimaging research

Perrine Janiaud (May 21). 100 DAYS LATER - The worldwide clinical trial research agenda in the beginning of the COVID-19 pandemic: results from COVID-evidence

Ben W Mol (May 14). Cost-effectiveness of liberal versus strict lock-down for COVID-19: are we using the correct metrics?

Cathrine Axfors (May 7). Population-level COVID-19 mortality risk for non-elderly individuals

Stephan Bruns (Apr 30). Estimating the extent of inflated significance in economic

Noah Haber and Sarah Wieten (Apr 23). DAG With Omitted Objects Displayed (DAGWOOD): A method for confronting causal assumptions

Florian Naudet (Apr 16). Will the ICMJE clinical data sharing policy achieve his intended objectives?

Benjamin Djulbegovic (Apr 9). Probability of discovering new treatments

Ioana Cristea (Apr 2). Reliability and accessibility of findings and tools reported in highly-cited research

Joshua Wallach (March 26). Opportunities for sharing and evaluating research: medRxiv and YODA project

Lars Hemkens (March 19). The COVID-evidence project: brainstorming on a new initiative