Publications
Featured Publication:
Evaluation
Doing the Right Thing: A Qualitative Investigation of Retractions Due to Unintentional Error
Results:
-
Expanding group peer review: A proposal for medical education scholarship
Dumenco L., Engle D.L., Goodell K., Nagler A., Ovitsh R.K., Whicker S.A. Evaluation
Source Info:
- Journal Title: Academic Medicine
- Publication Date: 2017
- Issue #: 2
- Page #: 147 - 149
DOI: 10.1097/ACM.0000000000001384
-
Polarity of comments and internal consistency in peer review reports on scientific research articles [Polaridade dos comentários e consistência interna nos informes de arbitragem de artigos de pesquisa] [Polaridad De Los Comentarios Y Consistencia Interna En Los Informes De Arbitraje De ArtÃculos De Investigación]
Astudillo C., Squadrito K., Varas G., González C., Sabaj O. Evaluation
Source Info:
- Journal Title: Acta Bioethica
- Publication Date: 2016
- Issue #: 1
- Page #: 119 - 128
DOI: 10.4067/S1726-569X2016000100013
-
Assessing postgraduate student perceptions and measures of learning in a peer review feedback process
Simpson G., Clifton J. Evaluation
Source Info:
- Journal Title: Assessment and Evaluation in Higher Education
- Publication Date: 2016
- Issue #: 4
- Page #: 501 - 514
DOI: 10.1080/02602938.2015.1026874
-
Improving the peer-review process from the perspective of an author and reviewer
Faggion C.M. Evaluation
Source Info:
- Journal Title: British Dental Journal
- Publication Date: 2016
- Issue #: 4
- Page #: 167 - 168
DOI: 10.1038/sj.bdj.2016.131
-
Organised crime against the academic peer review system
Cohen A., Pattanaik S., Kumar P., Bies R.R., De Boer A., Ferro A., Gilchrist A., Isbister G.K., Ross S., Webb A.J. Evaluation
Source Info:
- Journal Title: British Journal of Clinical Pharmacology
- Publication Date: 2016
- Issue #: 6
- Page #: 1012 - 1017
DOI: 10.1111/bcp.12992
-
How double-blind peer review works and what it takes to be a good referee
MartÃn E. Evaluation
Source Info:
- Journal Title: Current Sociology
- Publication Date: 2016
- Issue #: 5
- Page #: 691 - 698
DOI: 10.1177/0011392116656711
-
Editorial: How long does it take to deliver a peer review report? A decade of data from the European Journal of Plant Pathology
Pautasso M., Jeger M.J. Evaluation
Source Info:
- Journal Title: European Journal of Plant Pathology
- Publication Date: 2016
- Issue #: 2
- Page #: 231 - 233
DOI: 10.1007/s10658-015-0731-7
-
What we still don't know about peer review
Meruane O.S., Vergara C.G., Pina-Stranger A. Evaluation
Source Info:
- Journal Title: Journal of Scholarly Publishing
- Publication Date: 2016
- Issue #: 2
- Page #: 180 - 212
DOI: 10.3138/jsp.47.2.180
-
Open research practices: Unintended consequences and suggestions for averting them. (Commentary on the peer reviewersâ Openness initiative)
Bishop D.V.M. Evaluation
Source Info:
- Journal Title: Royal Society Open Science
- Publication Date: 2016
- Issue #: 4
DOI: 10.1098/rsos.160109
-
The Peer Reviewersâ Openness Initiative: Incentivizing open research practices through peer review
Morey R.D., Chambers C.D., Etchells P.J., Harris C.R., Hoekstra R., Lakens D., Lewandowsky S., Morey C.C., Newman D.P., Schönbrodt F.D., Vanpaemel W., Wagenmakers E.-J., Zwaan R.A. Evaluation
Source Info:
- Journal Title: Royal Society Open Science
- Publication Date: 2016
- Issue #: 1
DOI: 10.1098/rsos.150547