Metrics News

  • John Ioannidis, a professor at Stanford University and one of the most highly cited researchers in the world, has come up with some startling figures about meta-analyses. His new paper, published today in Milbank Quarterly (accompanied by this commentary), suggests that the number of systematic reviews and meta-analyses in literature have each increased by more than 2500% since 1991.
  • Let’s Make Peer Review Scientific

    Jul 06, 2016
    Nature Comment

    Authors: Drummond Rennie
    Thirty years on from the first congress on peer review, Drummond Rennie reflects on the improvements brought about by research into the process — and calls for more.
  • In a new paper with a provocative title, “Why most clinical research is not useful,” John Ioannidis, MD, DSc, makes the case that despite its name, much research that aims to improve outcomes in the clinic falls short, in part, because it isn’t designed to lead “to a favorable change in decision making… either by itself or when integrated with other studies and evidence.”
  • Researchers tease out different definitions of a crucial scientific term.
  • What Does Scientific Reproducibility Mean, Anyway?

    Jun 14, 2016

    Ivan Oransky
    Adam Marcus
    Reproducibility is one of the buzziest terms in science today. After all, science by its nature is not supposed to be a one-and-done affair.